Brett S. Sharp, Ph.D.

Political Science 5923: Urban Planning and Development

Dr. Brett S. Sharp, Assistant Professor, has been a practicing public administrator for over fourteen years. He received his Ph.D. and Master of Public Administration from the University of Oklahoma and a B.S. in Political Science/Public Affairs with a minor in Religious Studies from Oklahoma State University. He is currently the Associate Director of the Oklahoma Policy Research Center at UCO. He is the immediate past president of the Oklahoma Chapter of the American Society for Public Administration.

Office Hours: MWF 11:00 - 12:00 AM and MW 5:00-5:45 PM (and by appointment)

Office: LAR 102-J

Email: bsharp@ucok.edu

Telephone: (405) 974-5526

Fax: (405) 974-3823

Web Site: http://www.libarts.ucok.edu/political/faculty/sharp/index.html

Classroom: LAR 124

This course is designed to introduce the student to fresh perspectives on issues dealing with land use policies and economic development in the urban setting.

Student will read two books relevant to urban land use policy and economic development and analyze them through a political science/public administration perspective culminating in a review essay. The instructor will help guide the reading of the text by meeting with the student at various times in the semester. The student will then write reactions papers to a series of journal articles related to urban land use and economic development.

Fodor, Eben. (1999). Better not Bigger. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers (183 pp.).

Stone, Clarence N. and Sanders, Hewood T. (1994). Politics of Urban Development (312 pp.)

Scott, Gregory M. & Garrison, Stephen M. (2001). The Political Science Student Writer’s Manual (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

using the following scale:

90 -100 =A

80 - 89 = B

70 - 79 = C

60 - 69 = D

0 - 59 = F

Meetings with Instructor           20%

Book Review Essay                 40%

Article Reaction Paper #1       10%

Article Reaction Paper #2       10%

Article Reaction Paper #3       10%

Article Reaction Paper #4       10%

Discussion of the assigned readings is an important part of succeeding in this course and is required of all students. Meeting with the instructor provides an opportunity for you to ask questions, clarify issues, and deepen your understanding of the concepts covered in the assigned readings. If you are unable to make a meeting as arranged, you are responsible for rescheduling at the instructor’s convenience and availability. Regular communication with the instructor via email and telephone is also encouraged.

Your report should be in the form of an essay which includes a concise summary and more extensive analysis of the assigned books. Using the book review from a refereed journal (provided by the instructor) as a model and Scott and Garrison’s The Political Science Student Writer’s Manual as a guide, write a 7-10 page book review. The book review essay will be graded on format, grammar, summary of key points, and quality of analysis. The student may integrate other relevant readings (including journal articles for reaction papers—see below) into the review essay if desired.

The student will select four journal articles dealing with urban planning and economic development issues from recent refereed (peer-reviewed) academic publications or professional trade periodicals. For each article, the student will write a 3-5 page paper summarizing the work, critically evaluating its contribution to understanding urban planning and economic development issues, and providing a descriptive narrative detailing the student’s reaction to the readings.

Based upon the Oklahoma Regents’ Statement on Course Workload and Homework [OSRHE II-2-34], a college student should expect to spend 3 hours, on average, on outside work for each hour spent in class. The message the Oklahoma Regents are trying to communicate is that if you have a full time job (30-40 hours) you should not simultaneously expect to maintain a full-time academic schedule (15 hours). If you expect to do well, expect to put in the time!

The University of Central Oklahoma complies with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the American with Disabilities Act of 1990. Students with disabilities who need special accommodations must make their requests by contacting the Coordinator of Disability Support Services, Ms. Kimberly Fields at (405) 974-2549. The DSS Office is located in the Nigh University Center, Room 415. Students should also notify the instructor of special accommodation needs by the end of the first week of class.

Cheating = Failure (please refer to attached Academic Integrity Statement). Cheating is unacceptable conduct and will result in an automatic grade of "F" for the course, and be reported to Academic Affairs. Students are required to do all of the work for this class on their own. Copying answers to exercises or examinations from anyone constitutes cheating. Allowing another student to copy one’s answers will be treated as cheating. A student may discuss exercises and case briefs with others before preparing his or her own answers, but the answers must be each student’s own work product. Consulting with the instructor about any assignment does not constitute cheating and is encouraged.

The Political Science Department of the University of Central Oklahoma is asking all students taking political science courses to read the following Academic Integrity Statement. Our purpose in doing so is to ensure that all our students are aware of what is improper academic behavior.

As members of the academic community, students are expected to recognize and uphold standards of intellectual and academic integrity. The Political Science Department expects that its students will conduct themselves honestly. This means, above all, that students submit for credit work that is the product of their own efforts. Principles of academic integrity require that all dishonest work be rejected as a basis for academic credit, and that students refrain from any and all forms of dishonorable conduct in the course of their academic work. The examples and definitions given below are intended to clarify the standards by which academic honesty and integrity is judged. The list is merely illustrative of some of the more common infractions. It is not intended to be exhaustive. Any question a student has about what constitutes inappropriate behavior should be directed towards their instructor. The rule of thumb to follow is: If in doubt, ASK!

Plagiarism - Plagiarism is presenting another person’s work as one’s own. Plagiarism includes not only the exact use of another’s words, word for word, but also the paraphrasing or summarizing of the works of another person without acknowledgment, including the submitting of another student’s work as one’s own. The student is responsible for understanding the legitimate use of sources, the appropriate ways of acknowledging academic, scholarly, or creative indebtedness, and the consequences of violating this responsibility. In case of doubt, give a citation of the author you are using. Failure to indicate the extent and nature of one's reliance on other sources is plagiarism. A plagiarized paper will result in a failing grade on the work in question, and perhaps, for the entire course.

Cheating on Examinations - Cheating on examinations involves giving or receiving unauthorized help before, during, or after an examination. Examples of unauthorized help include the use of notes, texts, or "crib sheets" during an examination (unless receiving instructor approval), or sharing information with another student either during or after an examination.

Falsification - It is a violation of academic honesty to misrepresent material or to fabricate information in an academic exercise or assignment (e.g. false or misleading citation of sources, the falsification of the results of experiments or of computer data).

Multiple Submissions - It is a violation of academic honesty to submit substantial portions of the same work for credit more than once without the explicit consent of the instructor to whom the material is being submitted the second time.