Old North at University of Central Oklahoma - Link to Main UCO Page

Brett S. Sharp, Ph.D.

Political Science 1203 (30321): State and Local Government

Summer 2002 (June Block): Monday through Friday 8:10-10:20 AM

Review Sheet for Final Exam has been posted below.

ABOUT THE INSTRUCTOR:

Dr. Brett S. Sharp, Assistant Professor, has considerable professional and administrative experience in both state and local government. He received his Ph.D. and Master of Public Administration from the University of Oklahoma and a Bachelor of Science in Political Science/Public Affairs with a minor in Religious Studies from Oklahoma State University. He is currently the Associate Director of the Oklahoma Policy Research Center at UCO conducting policy analysis and other research on state and local issues in Oklahoma. He is the immediate past president of the Oklahoma Chapter of the American Society for Public Administration.

Office Hours: Monday through Friday 10:20 -10:40 AM (and by appointment)

Office: LA 102-J (in Political Science suite)

Email:  bsharp@ucok.edu

Telephone: (405) 974-5526

Fax: (405) 974-3823

Web Site: http://www.libarts.ucok.edu/political/faculty/sharp

Classroom: LAR 116

 

 

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

This course introduces the structure and process of state and local government in the United States with an emphasis on Oklahoma. The focus will be on current issues facing sub-national governments and how they respond to various public policy challenges. The roles played by elected leaders, policy makers, administrators, interest groups, and citizens in the political process will also be explored. Through a series of real-life case studies, we will analyze how people actually operate within a political framework to impact public policy.

 

TEACHING METHODS/LEARNING EXPERIENCES:

This course is designed for active student participation and includes several case studies, presentations of readings, and other in-class simulations. Classroom questions and discussion are strongly encouraged. Students will attend lectures which will orient them to basic concepts and information concerning state and local government. Students are responsible, through self-study and reading assignments, for learning relevant concepts and practices of state and local government. Each student will also present an article review and write an issue paper over state or local government issues. The student is responsible for retaining backup copies of all homework assignments. Students should be aware that some flexibility is retained in the syllabus to accommodate invited speakers and other learning opportunities. Students should regularly check the professor’s web site for any class announcements.

 

TEXTS

Cox, George H. and Rosenfeld, Raymond A.. (2001). State and Local Government: Public Life in America. Boston: Wadsworth. [Required]

 

Markwood, Christopher L. (Ed.). (2000). Oklahoma Government & Politics: An Introduction (2nd Ed). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing. [Required]

 

Ehrenhalt, Alan. (Ed.). (2002). Governing: Issues and Applications from the Front Lines of Government. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

 

Scott, Gregory M. & Garrison, Stephen M. (2001). The Political Science Student Writer’s Manual (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Recommended]

 

Course Schedule - Summer 2002

 

Day

Topics

Readings

Case Studies

Mon, June 3

Introductions/Syllabus

Syllabus

Video Segment: The Power of Place

Tue, June 4

Society, Culture & Popular Government

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 1

Markwood, Chap. 2

Ehrenhalt, pp. 47-51

Video: Political Science Careers

Case 13: Ways to Sway an MPA

Video Segment: Spanish City

Wed, June 5

Federalism and Intergovernmental Relations

American Indian tribes

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 2

Markwood, Chap. 1

Ehrenhalt, pp. xiii-5, 119-124

Case 1: Regional Agitator

Case 29: Save Us From the States!

Thu, June 6

Political Parties

Elections

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 3

Markwood, Chap. 8 & 10

Ehrenhalt, pp. 25-27, 149-151

Video Segment: Voter Registration

Case 25: Nepotism and the Meat Ax

Case 38: Rudderless in Hartford

Fri, June 7

State Legislatures

Public Finance

Fiscal Federalism

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 4

Markwood, Chap. 4

Ehrenhalt, pp. 21-31, 125-128, 157-160

Case 5: Budget Shocks

Case 6: Heading for Hemorrhage

Case 7: Taxing the Weightless Economy

Case 30: E-economics Problem

Case 40: Good Old Boy, Circa 2001

Mon, June 10

Governors

State Executives

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 5

Markwood, Chap. 5

Ehrenhalt, pp. 39-42, 54-57

Video Segment: California Propositions

Case 10: Raising Alabama

Case 15: Fad Mad

Tue, June 11

State Government

Bureaucracy

Regulation

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 6

Markwood, Chap. 6

Ehrenhalt, pp. 76-80, 97-99, 136-138

Case 20: High-Tech, Low-Tech

Case 24: Stinging the Blues

Case 34: Whistleblowers Anonymous

Wed, June 12

Research Issue Paper at Library Day

Thu, June 13

State Management/

State Courts

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 7

Markwood, Chap. 7

Ehrenhalt, pp. 43-46, 58-62

Case 11: The Buzz Over Balance

Case 16: Who Needs Civil Service

Video Segment: Texas Tobacco

Fri, June 14

Communities

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap 8

Ehrenhalt, pp. 101-104

Video Segment: Preservation v Freedom

Case 25: Rehab Refugees

Video Segment: Thirsty Texas

Mon, June 17

Midterm Exam

 

STUDY GUIDE

Tue, June 18

Political Participation/

Interest Groups

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 9

Markwood, Chap. 9

Ehrenhalt, pp. 64-68, 81-86, 131-135, 141-142

Case 17: Behind the Portal

Case 21: The Riskiest Business

Case 33: Winning Without Food and Cigars

Case 36: Ethical Conflicts That Won’t Go Away

Wed, June 19

Municipal Government

Performance Measures

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 10

Ehrenhalt, pp. 6-10, 34-38, 47-48

Video Segment: Big City Corruption

Case 2: Nobody in Charge

Case 9: Restless for Results

Case 12: In Search of a Mission Statement

Thu, June 20

County Government

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 11

Markwood, Chap. 11

Ehrenhalt, pp. 11-20

Video Segment: Tale of Two Counties

Case 3: Cry, the Beleaguered County

Case 4: Good Government, Bad Government

Fri, June 21

School Districts and

Education

Ehrenhalt, pp. 32-33, 110-114

Video Segment: Multiculturalism

Video Segment: SATs No More

Case 8: The Game of Mystery Bucks

Case 27: The Case of the Missing Schools

Mon, June 24

Metropolitan Policy

Municipal Management

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 12

Markwood, Chap. 12

Ehrenhalt, pp. 52-53, 100, 115-118, 143-148

Video Segment: Open Door Mayor

Case 14: Reckoning with Rewards

Case 28: The Stadium Trap

Case 37: Mayor Brown & Mr. Bobb

Tue, June 25

Local Policy Making

Historic Preservation

Technology Policy

Land Use

Cox & Rosenfeld, Chap. 13

Ehrenhalt, pp. 63, 69-75, 92-96

Video Segment: Dry Chicago

Case 18: Our Dying Data

Case 19: Technotrouble

Case 23: The Trouble With Zoning

Wed, June 26

Urban Sprawl

Transportation Policy

Ehrenhalt, pp. 105-109, 152-156

Case 26: Rendezvous with Density

Case 39: The Merchant Mayor

Video: Coming & Going

Thu, June 27

Course Wrap-up

Issue Paper Due

Video: The New Mayor

Fri, June 28

Final Exam

 

REVIEW SHEET

 

ADA STATEMENT

The University of Central Oklahoma complies with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Students with disabilities who need special accommodations should make their requests by contacting the coordinator of Disability Support Services at 974-2459. Their office is located in the Administration Building, Room 211. Students should immediately notify the instructor of any special accommodations needs.

 

EVALUATION METHODS AND GRADING

Instructor will determine final grades using the following scale:

  90 -100 = A

  80 -  89 = B

  70 -  79 = C

  60 -  69 = D

    0 -  59 = F

 

Grading components include:

  Participation10%

  Quizzes10%

  Case Study/Article Review15%

  Issue Paper 20%

  Mid-Term Exam 20%

  Final Exam 25%

 

CLASS ATTENDANCE & PARTICIPATION

Class attendance is an important part of succeeding in this class and is expected of all students. Class time provides an opportunity for you to ask questions, clarify issues, and deepen your understanding of the concepts covered in the text. If you are absent, you are responsible for getting any notes, assignments, and schedule changes made on that day. If you come in late, you are responsible for seeing that the attendance record is correct. Class attendance may affect marginal grades and will be considered when assigning participation points.

Above and beyond the expected class attendance, students are required to complete the readings as assigned (see course schedule) prior to the beginning of the class period. Demonstrated mastery of the assigned readings through class discussion is necessary to earn full participation points.

 

QUIZZES AND READING ASSIGNMENTS

Readings as assigned on the course schedule must be completed before the date indicated. To encourage faithful and current reading of the text, quizzes will be occasionally administered during class time. Your lowest quiz grade will be dropped and the others will be averaged together. No makeups on quizzes will be offered.

 

REQUIREMENTS FOR ARTICLE REVIEW

Each student will select an article from the supplementary textbook, Governing: Issues and Applications from the Front Lines of Government. The student will then prepare a 2-3 page analytical response to the contents. The student may (but is not required to) draw upon outside readings in preparing their analytical response. Each article review will be presented to the rest of the class according to the schedule as arranged with the instructor. Students should briefly summarize the facts, highlight the key issues, and present their analysis. These article reviews should also include 2-3 thought provoking questions to be posed to the rest of the class in order to stimulate class discussion. Students will be allowed up ten-fifteen minutes for their presentation and subsequent class discussion. This assignment will be graded on quality of presentation, summary of relevant points, analysis, questions, and resulting class discussion. Discussion for related articles may be combined by the instructor.

 

REQUIREMENTS FOR ISSUE PAPER

Each student will write a 5-6 page, double-spaced research paper for this course. You will choose as your topic some issue that directly relates to contemporary state and local government or politics. While you must cite sufficient references to make your paper convincing, this assignment requires a minimum of three references from outside sources. Students should follow an accepted style convention such as outlined in the recommended textbook by Scott and Garrison, The Political Science Student Writers Manual. The research paper is due at the beginning of class, Thursday, June 27. Papers will be graded on topic selection, format, grammar, writing style, citation convention, content delivery, analysis, and research quality. Please

refer to the discussion of plagiarism in the Academic Integrity Statement attached to the syllabus as well as pages 164-167 in The Political Science Student Writers Manual.

 

EXAMINATIONS

There will be two examinations during the semester. The first exam will be comprised of multiple choice questions. The final exam will be comprehensive and may be comprised of essay, short answer, and/or multiple choice questions. Make up examinations will not be offered except for documented emergencies. Even then, an alternate form of the examination will likely be substituted. In case of school cancellation due to weather or other reasons during the scheduled time for the final exam, university policy will be followed in the assigning of grades, which in the past has included the professor’s best judgment to what the student has earned up until that point. Therefore, it is in your best interest not to depend upon the final exam to make up for previously poor grades.

 

OUTSIDE WORK

Based upon the Oklahoma Regents’ Statement on Course Workload and Homework [OSRHE II-2-34], a college student should expect to spend 3 hours, on average, on outside work for each hour spent in class. The message the Oklahoma Regents are trying to communicate is that if you have a full time job (30-40 hours) you should not simultaneously expect to maintain a full-time academic schedule. If you expect to do well, expect to put in the time!

The Political Science Department of the University of Central Oklahoma is asking all students taking political science courses to read the following Academic Integrity Statement. Our purpose in doing so is to ensure that all our students are aware of what is improper academic behavior.

 

ACADEMIC HONESTY

Cheating = Failure (please refer to attached Academic Integrity Statement). Cheating is unacceptable conduct and will result in an automatic grade of "F" for the course, and be reported to Academic Affairs. Students are required to do all of the work for this class on their own. Copying answers to exercises or examinations from anyone constitutes cheating. Allowing another student to copy one’s answers will be treated as cheating. Consulting with the instructor about any assignment does not constitute cheating and is encouraged.

 

Academic Integrity Statement

As members of the academic community, students are expected to recognize and uphold standards of intellectual and academic integrity. The Political Science Department expects that its students will conduct themselves honestly. This means, above all, that students submit for credit work that is the product of their own efforts. Principles of academic integrity require that all dishonest work be rejected as a basis for academic credit, and that students refrain from any and all forms of dishonorable conduct in the course of their academic work.

The examples and definitions given below are intended to clarify the standards by which academic honesty and integrity is judged. The list is merely illustrative of some of the more common infractions. It is not intended to be exhaustive. Any question a student has about what constitutes inappropriate behavior should be directed towards their instructor. The rule of thumb to follow is: If in doubt, ASK!

 

Definitions and Examples

Plagiarism - Plagiarism is presenting another person’s work as one’s own. Plagiarism includes not only the exact use of another’s words, word for word, but also the paraphrasing or summarizing of the works of another person without acknowledgment, including the submitting of another student’s work as one’s own. The student is responsible for understanding the legitimate use of sources, the appropriate ways of acknowledging academic, scholarly, or creative indebtedness, and the consequences of violating this responsibility. In case of doubt, give a citation of the author you are using. Failure to indicate the extent and nature of one's reliance on other sources is plagiarism. A plagiarized paper will result in a failing grade on the work in question, and perhaps, for the entire course.

Cheating on Examinations - Cheating on examinations involves giving or receiving unauthorized help before, during, or after an examination. Examples of unauthorized help include the use of notes, texts, or "crib sheets" during an examination (unless receiving instructor approval), or sharing information with another student either during or after an examination.

Falsification - It is a violation of academic honesty to misrepresent material or to fabricate information in an academic exercise or assignment (e.g. false or misleading citation of sources, the falsification of the results of experiments or of computer data).

Multiple Submissions - It is a violation of academic honesty to submit substantial portions of the same work for credit more than once without the explicit consent of the instructor to whom the material is being submitted the second time.