Important: Read and Refer Often to the Information in This Syllabus!


Political Science 1203.20013: State and Local Government

University of Central Oklahoma: Syllabus for Fall 2006

 

 


ABOUT THE INSTRUCTOR:

Dr. Brett S. Sharp, Associate Professor, has considerable professional and administrative experience in both state and local government. He received his Ph.D. and Master of Public Administration from the University of Oklahoma and a Bachelor of Science in Political Science/Public Affairs with a minor in Religious Studies from Oklahoma State University. He is a past president of the Oklahoma Chapter of the American Society for Public Administration.

 

            Contact Hours: Mon/Wed/Fri 9:30-10:00 AM and Wed 7:00-7:30 PM (and by appointment)

            Office:             Liberal Arts Bldg 102-J (in Political Science suite)             Email: bsharp@ucok.edu

            Telephone:       (405) 974-5526 (with voice mail)                                         Fax:    (405) 974-3823

            Web Site:         http://www.libarts.ucok.edu/political/faculty/sharp             Classroom: LAR 120

 


COURSE DESCRIPTION:

This course introduces the structure and process of state and local government in the United States with an emphasis on Oklahoma. The focus will be on current issues and emerging trends facing state and local governments and how they respond to various public policy challenges. The roles played by elected leaders, policy makers, administrators, interest groups, and citizens in the political process will also be explored. Through a series of real-life case studies, we will analyze how people actually operate within a political framework to impact public policy at the state and local levels.

 


TEACHING METHODS/LEARNING EXPERIENCES:

This course is designed for active student participation and includes several case studies, presentations of readings, videos, and other in-class simulations. Classroom questions and discussion are strongly encouraged. Students will attend lectures which will orient them to basic concepts and information concerning state and local government. Students are responsible, through self-study and reading assignments, for learning relevant concepts and practices of state and local government. Each student will also write and present an article review over state or local government issues. The student is responsible for retaining backup copies of all assignments until final grades are posted. Students should be aware that some flexibility is retained in the syllabus to accommodate invited speakers and other learning opportunities. Students should regularly check the professor’s web site for any class announcements.

 

 

TEXTS

Bowman, Ann O’M and Kearney, Richard C. (2005). State and Local Government (6th Ed.). Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company. [Required]

 

Markwood, Christopher L. and Sharp, Brett S. (Eds.). (2005). Oklahoma Government & Politics: An Introduction (3nd Ed). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing. [Required]

 

Ehrenhalt, Alan. (Ed.). (2005). Governing: Issues and Applications from the Front Lines of Government. Washington, DC: CQ Press. [Required]

 

Scott, Gregory M. & Garrison, Stephen M. (2006). The Political Science Student Writer’s Manual (5th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Highly Recommended]

 

Course Schedule - Fall 2006

Week

Monday

Wednesday

Friday

Aug 21-

Aug 25

Political Culture

Intros/Syllabus & Course Overview

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 1

Video: The Oklahoma Video

Schedule Case/Article Presentations

Aug 28-

Sep 1

Federalism & the States

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 2

Markwood & Sharp: Chap. 1

State Constitutions

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 3

Markwood & Sharp: Chap. 2

Case 27: Politics and Promises

Case 29: Enemies of the State

Case 32: HUD the Unlovable

Sep 4-

Sep 8

Labor Day

Citizen Participation

Bowman/Kearney: Chaps. 4

Markwood & Sharp: Chaps. 9

Case 30: Made in Sacramento

Case 35: Addicted to Corruption

Case 13: Dot-Bomb Silver Lining

Sep 11-

Sep 15

Political Parties

Bowman/Kearney: Chaps. 5

Markwood & Sharp: Chaps. 10

Interest Groups

Case 37: Sugar Daddy Government

Case 36: The Soft-Money Crackdown

Case 38: How to Repair City

Sep 18-

Sep 22

First Exam

Review Sheet

Test Results & Review

Video: Political Science Careers

E-Government

Case 16: Honey, I Shrunk the Deficit

Sep 25-

Sep 29

Case 15: Dealing in Data

Case 18: The E-mail Mess

Case 28: Breaking and Entering

 Legislatures

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 6

Markwood & Sharp: Chap. 4

Case 1: City Councils a Relic of the Past?

Case 3: In Search of the Ideal Legislature

Case 14: Legislators Who Get IT

Oct 2-

Oct 6

Video: Phoenix—Urban Desert

Governors/Executives

Public Administration

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 7-8

Markwood & Sharp: Chap. 5-6

Case 9: Worth the Money?

Case 10: Going Outside

Case 40: Huge Turnover in Hard Times

Oct 9-

Oct 13

Judiciary/Criminal Justice Policy

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 9 & 16

Markwood & Sharp: Chaps. 7-8

Guest Speaker

Jeanette Nance,

Agency Liaison & Public Policy Specialist

Office of Governor Brad Henry

Case 21: Murder Mystery

Case 22: Revising Sentences

Case 33: The Avengers General

Oct 16-

Oct 20

Sociology Survey

Local Government

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 10-11

Markwood & Sharp: Chap. 12

Video: Capitol Dome Celebration

Fall Break

Oct 23-

Oct 27

State & Local Finance

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 12-13

Markwood & Sharp: Chap. 11

Second Exam

Review Sheet

Case 2: Anatomy of a Merger

Case 39: Capital Gains

Case 31: Squeezing the Federal Turnip

Oct 30-

Nov 3

Economic Development

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 14

Markwood & Sharp: Chap. 3

Video: Mayor’s Magazine - MAPS

Case 4: The Phantom of New York

Case 5: The Great GASB

Case 19: Who’s Afraid of the DMV?

Nov 6-

Nov 10

Transportation Policy

Video: Stateline: Road Trip

Video: Coming & Going—Road to the Future

Case 7: The Well That Dried Up

Case 8: Risky Ventures

Case 20: Unscrambling the City

Nov 13-

Nov 17

Historic Preservation

Education Policy

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 15

Markwood & Sharp: Chap. 13

Library Research Day

(OPSA Conference)

Nov 20-

Nov 24

Video: We Built This City-NY

Thanksgiving Break

Nov 27-

Dec 1

Health Care Policy

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 17

Case 23: Deadly Strains

Case 24: Maine’s Medical Gamble

Case 11: Payout Planning

Library Research Day

Dec 4-

Dec 8

Environmental Policy

Bowman/Kearney: Chap. 18

Library Research Day

Course Wrap-Up

Research/Issue Paper Due

Final Exam - Monday, December 11: 11:00 AM - 12:50 PM

REVIEW SHEET

EVALUATION METHODS AND GRADING

            Instructor will determine course grades                 Grading components include:

            using the following scale:                                                     Participation                                                 5%

                            90 -100        =         A                                             Quizzes                                                        5%

                            80 - 89        =         B                                             Case Study/Article Review                        10%

                            70 - 79        =         C                                             First Mid-Term Exam                                20%

                            60 - 69        =         D                                             Second Mid-Term Exam                            20%

                              0 - 59        =         F                                             Research/Issue Paper*                               20%

Final Exam20%

 

                    *   You may elect not to turn in an issue paper, and if so, the average of your first two exams will substitute for this score. Alternatively, you may turn in an issue paper, and your lowest exam score will be dropped. The average of your highest exam score and your issue paper would then substitute for the lowest exam score.

 

CLASS ATTENDANCE & PARTICIPATION

Class attendance is an important part of succeeding in this class and is expected of all students. Class time provides an opportunity for you to ask questions, clarify issues, and deepen your understanding of the concepts covered in the text. If you are absent, you are responsible for getting any notes, assignments, and schedule changes made on that day. If you come in late, you are responsible for seeing that the attendance record is correct. Class attendance may affect marginal grades and will be considered when assigning participation points. Above and beyond the expected class attendance, students are required to complete the readings as assigned (see course schedule) prior to the beginning of the class period. Demonstrated mastery of the assigned readings through class discussion is necessary to earn full participation points.


QUIZZES AND READING ASSIGNMENTS

Readings as assigned on the course schedule must be completed before the date indicated. To encourage faithful and current reading of the text, quizzes may be occasionally administered during class time. In addition, you are responsible for reading all of the cases scheduled for class discussion prior to classtime even if you are not assigned to present a case that day. If more than one quiz is administered, your lowest quiz grade will be dropped and the others will be averaged together. If no quizzes are administered, the final exam will be worth 25%. No makeups on quizzes will be offered.


REQUIREMENTS FOR CASE STUDY/ARTICLE REVIEW

Each student will select an article from the supplementary textbook, Governing: Issues and Applications from the Front Lines of Government. The student will then prepare a 2-3 page analytical response to the contents. The student may (but is not required to) draw upon outside readings in preparing their analytical response. Each article review will be presented to the rest of the class according to the schedule as arranged with the instructor. Students should briefly summarize the facts, highlight the key issues, and present their analysis. The article review should also include 2-3 thought provoking questions to be posed to the rest of the class in order to stimulate class discussion. Students will be allowed up to fifteen minutes for their presentation and subsequent class discussion. This assignment will be graded on quality of presentation, summary of relevant points, analysis, questions, and resulting class discussion.


EXAMINATIONS

There will be three examinations during the semester. The first two exams will be comprised of multiple choice questions. The final exam will be comprehensive and may be comprised of essay, short answer, and/or multiple choice questions. Make up examinations will not be offered except for documented emergencies. Even then, an alternate form of the examination will likely be substituted. In case of school cancellation due to weather or other reasons during the scheduled time for the final exam, university policy will be followed in the assigning of grades, which in the past has included the professor’s best judgment to what the student has earned up until that point. Therefore, it is in your best interest not to depend upon the final exam to make up for previously poor grades. Also, see note on Research/Issue Paper option (above).


REQUIREMENTS FOR RESEARCH/ISSUE PAPER

Each student that elects this option will write an 8-10 page, double-spaced research paper for this course. You will choose as your topic some issue that directly relates to contemporary state and local government or politics. While you must cite sufficient references to make your paper convincing, this assignment requires a minimum of five (5) references from outside sources. Students should follow an accepted style convention such as outlined in the recommended textbook by Scott and Garrison, The Political Science Student Writers Manual or the American Psychological Association (APA). The research paper is due at the beginning of class, Friday, December 8. Papers will be graded on topic selection, format, grammar, writing style, citation convention, content delivery, analysis, and research quality. Please refer to the discussion of plagiarism in the Academic Integrity Statement attached to the syllabus as well as the Fall 2006 Student Information Sheet/Syllabus Attachment, and The Political Science Student Writer’s Manual.


ACADEMIC HONESTY

Cheating = Failure (please refer to both the attached Academic Integrity Statement and the Fall 2006 Student Information Sheet/Syllabus Attachment). Cheating is unacceptable conduct and will result in an automatic grade of “F” for the course, and be reported to Academic Affairs. Students are required to do all of the work for this class on their own. Copying answers to exercises or examinations from anyone constitutes cheating. Allowing another student to copy one’s answers will be treated as cheating. Consulting with the instructor about any assignment does not constitute cheating and is encouraged.


The Political Science Department of the University of Central Oklahoma is asking all students taking political science courses to read the following Academic Integrity Statement. Our purpose in doing so is to ensure that all our students are aware of what is improper academic behavior.


horizontal rule

 

Academic Integrity Statement

As members of the academic community, students are expected to recognize and uphold standards of intellectual and academic integrity. The Political Science Department expects that its students will conduct themselves honestly. This means, above all, that students submit for credit work that is the product of their own efforts. Principles of academic integrity require that all dishonest work be rejected as a basis for academic credit, and that students refrain from any and all forms of dishonorable conduct in the course of their academic work.

The examples and definitions given below are intended to clarify the standards by which academic honesty and integrity is judged. The list is merely illustrative of some of the more common infractions. It is not intended to be exhaustive. Any question a student has about what constitutes inappropriate behavior should be directed towards their instructor. The rule of thumb to follow is: If in doubt, ASK!

Definitions and Examples

Plagiarism - Plagiarism is presenting another person’s work as one’s own. Plagiarism includes not only the exact use of another’s words, word for word, but also the paraphrasing or summarizing of the works of another person without acknowledgment, including the submitting of another student’s work as one’s own. The student is responsible for understanding the legitimate use of sources, the appropriate ways of acknowledging academic, scholarly, or creative indebtedness, and the consequences of violating this responsibility. In case of doubt, give a citation of the author you are using. Failure to indicate the extent and nature of one's reliance on other sources is plagiarism. A plagiarized paper will result in a failing grade on the work in question, and perhaps, for the entire course.

Cheating on Examinations - Cheating on examinations involves giving or receiving unauthorized help before, during, or after an examination. Examples of unauthorized help include the use of notes, texts, or “crib sheets” during an examination (unless receiving instructor approval), or sharing information with another student either during or after an examination.

Falsification - It is a violation of academic honesty to misrepresent material or to fabricate information in an academic exercise or assignment (e.g. false or misleading citation of sources; falsification of survey results, experiments, or computer data).

Multiple Submissions - It is a violation of academic honesty to submit substantial portions of the same work for credit more than once without the explicit consent of the instructor to whom the material is being submitted the second time.



Turnitin.com Plagiarism Syllabus Statement: UCO subscribes to the Turnitin.com plagiarism prevention service. Students agree that by taking this course, all required assignments may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted assignments will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com restricted access reference database for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such assignments.


Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com website. Turnitin.com is just one of various plagiarism prevention tools and methods which may be utilized by your faculty instructor during the terms of the semesters. In the UCO Student Handbook, there is a process for contesting any plagiarism allegations against you.



Article Review Schedule - Fall 2006

Day

Case Studies

Student Name

Friday, Sep. 1

Case 27: Politics and Promises

Aaron W.

Case 29: Enemies of the State

Steve R.

Case 32: HUD the Unlovable

 Rhett B.

Friday, Sep. 8

Case 30: Made in Sacramento

 Link L.

Case 35: Addicted to Corruption

 Danielle L.

Case 13: Dot-Bomb Silver Lining

 

Friday, Sep. 15

Case 36: The Soft Money Crackdown

 

Case 37: Sugar Daddy Government

 Heather C.

Case 38: How to Repair the City

 Matt S.

Friday, Sep. 22

Case 16: Honey, I Shrunk the Deficit

 Cyndi M.

Monday, Sep. 25

Case 15: Dealing in Data

 

Case 18: The E-Mail Mess

 Scott A.

Case 28: Breaking and Entering

 Megan F.

Friday, Sep. 29

Case 1: Are City Councils a Relic of the Past?

 Kelby B.

Case 3: In Search of the Ideal Legislature

 Blake G.

Case 14: Legislators Who Get IT

 Teara F.

Friday, Oct. 6

Case 9: Worth the Money?

 Brit M.

Case 10: Going Outside

 Kylie S.

Case 40: Huge Turnover in Hard Times

 Cristy S.

Friday, Oct. 13

Case 21: Murder Mystery

 Jeff C.

 

 

Case 33: The Avengers General

 Brittany L.

Friday, Oct. 27

Case 2: Anatomy of a Merger

 Billey

Case 22: Revising Sentences Ta-keia F.
Case 5: The Great GASB Nicole G.

Case 31: Squeezing the Federal Turnip

 Kevin B.

Friday, Nov. 3

Case 4: The Phantom of New York

 Nicole L.

Case 25: The Left Behind Syndrome Latoya H
Case 26: Edge-ucation Melinda H.

Friday, Nov. 10


Case 7: The Well That Dried Up

 Andrew R.

Case 8: Risky Ventures

 Adam L.

Case 20: Unscrambling the City

 Daniel D.

Wednesday, Nov. 29

Case 23: Deadly Strains

 Jaye F.
Case 11: Payout Planning  Jonathon E.

Case 24: Maine’s Medical Gamble

 Josh T.