Old North at University of Central Oklahoma - Link to Main UCO Page

Brett S. Sharp, Ph.D.

Political Science 4443 (24381): Advanced Public Administration

Galloping elephants

Prerequisite: Junior Standing

Spring 2004: Wednesdays 7:30-10:15 p.m.

ABOUT THE INSTRUCTOR:

Dr. Brett S. Sharp, Assistant Professor, has been a practicing public administrator in state and local government for over fourteen years. He received his Ph.D. and Master of Public Administration from the University of Oklahoma and a B.S. in Political Science/Public Affairs with a minor in Religious Studies from Oklahoma State University. He is currently the Associate Director of the Oklahoma Policy Research Center at UCO. Dr. Sharp is certified as a Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) through the Society for Human Resource Management. He is the immediate past president of the Oklahoma Chapter of the American Society for Public Administration. The Oklahoma Political Science Association recently named him as the Oklahoma Political Science Teacher of the Year.

Office Hours:Mon/Wed/Fri 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM and Wed 5:00-5:45 PM (and by appointment)

Office:Liberal Arts Bldg 102-J (in Political Science suite)

Email: bsharp@ucok.edu

Telephone:(405) 974-5526 (with voice mail)

Fax:(405) 974-3823

Web Site:  http://www.libarts.ucok.edu/political/faculty/sharp

 

COURSE DESCRIPTION:

Analysis of contemporary public administration issues and cases related to citizen participation, decision making, ethics, public health, national defense, bureaucracy, organizational behavior, budgeting and finance, planning, policy analysis, leadership, privatization, management, and human resources. Emphasis on case studies.

TEACHING METHODS/LEARNING EXPERIENCES:

This class depends on active student participation and includes several case studies and other in-class simulations. Classroom questions and discussion are strongly encouraged. Students will attend lectures which will orient them to basic concepts and information concerning the practice of public administration. Students are responsible, through self-study and reading assignments, to learn relevant administrative concepts and applications. Students will also present case studies over a variety of public administration issues and review a contemporary book in administrative theory. The student is responsible for retaining backup copies of all homework assignments turned in. The student should also be aware that some flexibility is retained in the syllabus to accommodate invited speakers and other learning opportunities. Students should also regularly check the professor’s web site for any class announcements.

TEXTS

Linden, Russell M. (2002). Working Across Boundaries: Making Collaboration Work in Government and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers. [Required]

Cover of Linden's Working Across Boundaries book

Stillman, Richard J. (2000). Public Administration: Concepts and Cases (7th Ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. [Required]

Cover of Stillman's Public Administration

Scott, Gregory M. & Garrison, Stephen M. (2001). The Political Science Student Writer’s Manual (4th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall. [Recommended]

Cover of Scott & Garrison's Political Science Student Writer's Manual

 

 

Course Schedule - Spring 2004

Week

Hour 1

Hour 2

Hour 3

Jan 14

Introductions

Syllabus Review

Syllabus Review

Jan 21

Beginnings of Public Administration Stillman, 1-17

"The Eminently Practical Science" Stillman, 17-30

Case: Mine Blast in Centralia

Stillman, 30-47

Jan 28

Bureaucratization of the World

Stillman, 50-63

Case: How Kristin Died

Stillman, 64-79

Ecology of Public Administration Stillman, 80-86

Feb 4

Case: Dumping $2.6 Million on

Migratory

Stillman, 87-100

Case: Last Flight of the Space Shuttle Challenger

Stillman,109-124

Case: Space Shuttle Columbia

Intergovernmental Relations

Handout; Stillman, 125-145

Feb 11

Administrative Power in a Political Environment; Organizational Behavior

Stillman, 101-108; 156-168

Case: Wichita Confronts Contamination

Stillman, 146-155

Case: Light Rail System in Oklahoma City

Stillman, 156-168

Feb 18

Case: Uniforms in the Closet

Stillman, 169-181

Decision Analysis

Stillman, 182-206

Case: The Decision to Bomb the Serbs Stillman, 207-219

Feb 25

Incrementalism;

Administrative Communication

Stillman, 220-235; 257-276

Case: The MOVE Disaster

Stillman, 236-256

Case: Waco

Stillman, 277-295

Mar 3

Mid-Term Exam                    Review Sheet

Mar 10

Leaders in Public Organizations

Stillman, 296-320

Linden, Chap. 1

Case: The Crash of ValuJet 592 Stillman, 321-339

Linden, Chap. 2

Motivation Theory

Stillman, 340-352

Linden, Chap. 3

Mar 17

Spring Break

Mar 24

In-Class Case Study

Linden, Chap. 4-6

In-Class Case Study

In-Class Preparation Time for Group Presentation

Mar 31

In-Class Preparation Time for Group Presentation

Group Presentation

Case: Admiral Boorda’s War

Stillman, 353-373

Linden, Chap. 7

Apr 7

Public Finance & Budgeting

Stillman, 374-391

Case: County Prison Overtime

Stillman, 392-402

Case: Oregon Rationing Health Care Plan Stillman, 403-441

Apr 14

Public Policy

Case: Reinventing School Lunch Stillman, 456-472

Case Study: Orange County Bankruptcy Stillman, 485-497

Linden, Chap. 8-13

Apr 21

Book Review Due

 

 

Cover of Linden's Working Across Boundaries

Discussion of Linden’s Working Across Boundaries

 

Cover of Linden's Working Across Boundaries

Picture of Dr. Cynthia Rolfe, Vice President of IT, UCO

Guest Speaker:

Dr. Cynthia Rolfe,

VP  for Info Technology, UCO and Chairman of of the Edmond Area Chamber of Commerce, "Partnerships in Public Administration"

Apr 28

Ethics in the Public Service

Stillman, 498-511

Case: Madonna’s Sex

Stillman, 513-525

Course Wrap-up;

Final Exam Review

May 5

Final Exam - Wednesday, May 5: 7:00 - 8:50 p.m.

Review Sheet

 

EVALUATION METHODS AND GRADING

Instructor will determine course grades using the following scale:

    90 -100 = A

    80 - 89 = B

    70 - 79 = C

    60 - 69 = D

      0 - 59 = F

 

Grading components include:

    Book Review 20%

    Group Presentation 10%

    Case Study 15%

    Midterm Exam 20%

    Final Exam 25%

    Participation 10%

CLASS ATTENDANCE & PARTICIPATION

Attendance has its privileges. Class attendance is an important part of succeeding in this class and is expected of all students. Class time provides an opportunity for you to ask questions, clarify issues, and deepen your understanding of the concepts covered in the text. If you are absent, you are responsible for getting any notes, assignments, and schedule changes made on that day. If you come in late, you are responsible for seeing that the attendance record is correct.

Above and beyond the expected class attendance, students are required to complete the readings as assigned (see course schedule) prior to the beginning of the class period. Demonstrated mastery of the assigned readings through class discussion is necessary to earn full participation points.

In addition, students will have another opportunity to earn points by participating in an in-class case study culminating in a group presentation. For purposes of this exercise, the class will be broken up into teams to present their analysis of the case. Time in and out of class will be required for the completion of this assignment. Further guidance on this project will be provided closer to the time scheduled.

REQUIREMENTS FOR BOOK REVIEW

Write a 5-7 page, double-spaced typewritten report over Russ M. Linden’s, Working Across Boundaries: Making Collaboration Work in Government and Nonprofit Organizations. Your report should be in the form of an essay which includes a concise summary and more extensive analysis of the book. This report is due at the beginning of class, Wednesday, April 21. As part of your analysis, answer the following questions within the text of your report:

1.  What is the purpose of this book and what is its central thesis (philosophy or perspective)?

2.  Does the book achieve its goals?

3.  What is the method or approach used by the author to reach his conclusions?

4.  Are the the conclusions credible?

5.  What are the implications for the study and practice of public administration?

6.  What are the primary strengths and weaknesses of the book?

7.  Would you recommend this book to someone interested in public administration?  Why or why not?

 

REQUIREMENTS FOR CASE STUDIES

Each student will select a Case Study from the textbook by Stillman (or from handouts distributed by the instructor) and prepare a 3-5 page summary and analysis of the contents. These case reviews should also include 2-3 questions to be posed to the rest of the class in order to stimulate class discussion. Each case review will be presented to the rest of the class according to the schedule as arranged with the instructor. Students are expected to make full use of visual aids and multimedia materials if available. Superior papers and presentations will demonstrate original research to update the relevant case study.

 

EXAMINATIONS

There will be two exams during the semester. Both exams will be comprised of essay, short answer, and/or multiple choice questions. The final exam will be comprehensive. Make up examinations will not be offered except for documented emergencies. Even then, an alternate form of the examination will likely be substituted. In case of school cancellation due to weather or other reasons during the scheduled time for the final exam, university policy will be followed in the assigning of grades, which in the past has included the professor’s best judgment to what the student has earned up until that point. Therefore, your best interest is to not depend upon the final exam to make up for previously poor grades.

 

ADA STATEMENT

The University of Central Oklahoma complies with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Students with disabilities who need special accommodations should make their requests by contacting the coordinator of Disability Support Services at 974-2459. Their office is located in the Administration Building, Room 211. Students should also notify the instructor of special accommodations needs by the end of the first week of class.

 

EXTRA CREDIT

Up to five (5) percentage points of the overall total may be earned by attending select events related to the study or practice of public administration. Typically, one point will be offered for each event. Attendance and/or participation in the Student Symposium (on April 14, 2004) in any capacity will also earn extra credit.

 

OUTSIDE WORK

Based upon the Oklahoma Regents’ Statement on Course Workload and Homework [OSRHE II-2-34], a college student should expect to spend 3 hours, on average, on outside work for each hour spent in class. The message the Oklahoma Regents are trying to communicate is that if you have a full time job (30-40 hours) you should not simultaneously expect to maintain a full-time academic schedule (15 hours). If you expect to do well, expect to put in the time!

 

ACADEMIC HONESTY

Cheating = Failure (please refer to attached Academic Integrity Statement). Cheating is unacceptable conduct and will result in an automatic grade of "F" for the course, and be reported to Academic Affairs. Students are required to do all of the work for this class on their own. Copying answers to exercises or examinations from anyone constitutes cheating. Allowing another student to copy one’s answers will be treated as cheating. A student may discuss exercises and case briefs with others before preparing his or her own answers, but the answers must be each student’s own work product. Consulting with the instructor about any assignment does not constitute cheating and is encouraged.

 

The Political Science Department of the University of Central Oklahoma is asking all students taking political science courses to read the following Academic Integrity Statement. Our purpose in doing so is to ensure that all our students are aware of what is improper academic behavior.

horizontal rule

Academic Integrity Statement

As members of the academic community, students are expected to recognize and uphold standards of intellectual and academic integrity. The Political Science Department expects that its students will conduct themselves honestly. This means, above all, that students submit for credit work that is the product of their own efforts. Principles of academic integrity require that all dishonest work be rejected as a basis for academic credit, and that students refrain from any and all forms of dishonorable conduct in the course of their academic work.

The examples and definitions given below are intended to clarify the standards by which academic honesty and integrity is judged. The list is merely illustrative of some of the more common infractions. It is not intended to be exhaustive. Any question a student has about what constitutes inappropriate behavior should be directed towards their instructor. The rule of thumb to follow is: If in doubt, ASK!

 

Definitions and Examples

Plagiarism - Plagiarism is presenting another person’s work as one’s own. Plagiarism includes not only the exact use of another’s words, word for word, but also the paraphrasing or summarizing of the works of another person without acknowledgment, including the submitting of another student’s work as one’s own. The student is responsible for understanding the legitimate use of sources, the appropriate ways of acknowledging academic, scholarly, or creative indebtedness, and the consequences of violating this responsibility. In case of doubt, give a citation of the author you are using. Failure to indicate the extent and nature of one's reliance on other sources is plagiarism. A plagiarized paper will result in a failing grade on the work in question, and perhaps, for the entire course.

Cheating on Examinations - Cheating on examinations involves giving or receiving unauthorized help before, during, or after an examination. Examples of unauthorized help include the use of notes, texts, or "crib sheets" during an examination (unless receiving instructor approval), or sharing information with another student either during or after an examination.

Falsification - It is a violation of academic honesty to misrepresent material or to fabricate information in an academic exercise or assignment (e.g. false or misleading citation of sources, the falsification of the results of experiments or of computer data).

Multiple Submissions - It is a violation of academic honesty to submit substantial portions of the same work for credit more than once without the explicit consent of the instructor to whom the material is being submitted the second time.

 

 

Case Study Presentation Schedule - Spring 2004

Day

Case

Student Name

Jan 21

Mine Blast in Centralia

T.R.

Jan 28

How Kristin Died

Shonna

Feb 4

Dumping $2.6 Million on Migratory

Angela

Feb 4

Last Flight of the Space Shuttle Challenger

Kathy

Feb 4

Space Shuttle Columbia

James/Cheree

Feb 11

Wichita Confronts Contamination

Shannon

Feb 11

Light Rail System in OKC (Gazette)

Curtis

Feb 18

Uniforms in the Closet

Laura

Feb 18

The Decision to Bomb the Serbs

Robb

Feb 25

The MOVE Disaster

Jeff

Feb 25

Waco

Tish

Mar 10

The Crash of ValuJet 592

Jessica

Mar 31

Admiral Boorda’s War

Danny

Apr 7

County Prison Overtime

Allison

Apr 7

Oregon Rationing Health Care Plan

Jonathan

Apr 14

Reinventing School Lunch

Landon

Apr 14

Orange County Bankruptcy

Bob
Cody

Apr 28

Case: Madonna’s Sex

Nora

 

Previous Syllabus:

Spring 2002

 

Home Page