|
|
To most people, rhetoric is
a nasty, terrible word associated with the abuse of power. The O.J. case
didn't help this viewpoint, for it seemed to confirm what many believed
about rhetoric. However, this debate on what is rhetoric and
its possible abuses goes back in Western society to the another trial:
Socrates' trial.
Socrates' student, Plato, attacked the rhetoric that he felt was responsible for his teacher's death. It was a sophistic rhetoric developed to win at all costs. Words ruled over truth, indeed, created truth (epistemic in nature). This went against everything Socrates taught. Truth is knowable and should win, but with this new sophistic rhetoric, Socrates was forced to drink hemlock and became a martyr for Truth. Plato was obsessed with attacking this type of rhetoric. His obsession would rub off on his student, Aristotle, who would develop a more ethical rhetoric. Aristotle, Plato's student, was a more logical
person and developed his own brand of rhetoric. It became the model from
which Western society would be based. To understand Aristotelian rhetoric, the
ABC's of our rhetoric, one must begin by understanding the basic principles.
|
Last Updated: 08/28/01 , History of Rhetoric II, University of Central Oklahoma. Wayne Stein wstein@ucok.edu.